Insurrection: Introduction

In the introduction to “Insurrection” Rollins states his premise that the church has undergone several radical transformations over its history. The first of these was over the question of the circumcision of new believers found in the book of Acts. He mentions others in passing, such as the protestant reformation, but he focuses on that first debate. His claim is that each of these milestone events is an example of taking the old beliefs of what is required to worship God, and burn away the chaff to get to the true heart of worship and believe.

Given that there have been several such events throughout history, the implication of course is that we’re coming closer and closer to “true” belief. Rollins believes that we are in another such transition time now, and that the thing that is being “burned away” is religion itself. He quotes Bonhoeffer referring to something called “religionless Christianity” as at the core of the transition. “Insurrection” is Rollins attempt

… to outline what this radical expression of a faith beyond religion might look like and how it has the power to give birth to a radically new form of Church

My hope with these series of posts is that I’ll examine his position, as well as my own beliefs, hopefully coming out with a solid, mature understanding of my own faith, as well as where the church is heading.

back to table of contents

Share

Insurrection by Peter Rollins

The theologian Peter Rollins seems to be one who is speaking to me recently. Starting with “How (Not) to Speak of God” I’ve found myself drawn to his iconoclastic approach. His newest book is “Insurrection.” I’ve just completed reading it. I now want to go back through it, chapter by chapter, and write my thoughts. I’m doing this not so much for any one else to read as much as I am as something of a spiritual discipline for myself. My goal is do do one chapter every other day or so. I’d like to say a chapter a day, but I’m afraid that if I set too ambitious a schedule, then I’ll fall away and not do it at all.

This post will act as a table of contents to the posts on each chapter. I’ll update the links below as posts are written.

Introduction: There Is a Fire in the Building; Please Step Inside

Part One: Crucifixion
Chapter One: I’m a Christian! I’m a Christian!
Chapter Two: To Believe Is Human; To Doubt, Divine
Chapter Three: “I’m Not Religious” And Other Religious Sayings
Chapter Four: I Don’t Have To Believe; My Pastor Does That For Me

Part Two: Resurrection
Chapter Five: Story Crime
Chapter Six: We Are Destiny
Chapter Seven: I Believe In the Insurrection
Chapter Eight: Neither Christian Nor Non-Christian

Share

Gingrich more normal than Jesus?

I found this short video interesting. It’s Newt Gingrich talking about forgiveness for his past infidelities, which is certainly a fine topic for discussion. However, at the very end, he makes the claim that his public failings actually make him “more normal” than some unnamed person who “wanders around, seeming perfect.” I’m sure he’s referring to Mitt Romney, of course. But the first thought that jumped out at me when I heard this was “did he just compare himself to Jesus???”

oh, and I also liked the “been there/done that” comment from evangelicals on the infidelity thing. I know he meant forgiveness, but that’s not what it sounded like. ;)

Share

The passing of one of my favorite authors

One of my favorite authors, Anne McCaffrey,died today. I’ve been a fan ever since high school, when the girl who sat behind me in study hall, Amy Gheres, introduced me to her “Dragonrider” series. (Thanks, Amy!) There were only two book in the series then, and I remember waiting with anticipation as new books came out. (there are 14 in the series now). I also greatly enjoyed the “Crystal Singer” trilogy.

McCaffrey’s books tend to feature strong female characters, which was quite a break from the rest of the authors of the genre at the time. While there are certainly strong male characters, in general, it’s the women who are the primary focus of many of the books.

I may have to go back an re-read some of those books now. Anne McCaffrey, along with Frank Herbert and J.R.R. Tolkien, were the primary staples of my library as a young adult.

Share

Plugin documentation

I was really surprised when I was contacted recently by somebody who might want to use my theater productions plugin. I’m not 100% certain it’s going to do what he wants, but he’s willing to try. But that means that I need to actually document the silly thing. So I’ve spent this weekend writing up a first draft of a page on how to install and use my plugin.

Go ahead and give it a read if you’d like. If that doesn’t scare you away from using it, nothing will.

Share

There Are Two Marriages

Tony Jones posted an article on his blog this morning entitled There Are Two Marriages. This is something that Wendy has been espousing for years, and I’m glad to see somebody else bring this up.

The key point that’s being made, as I see it, is that the concepts of marriage and civil union, long considered synonymous, should be broken apart into their component elements. The state has an interest in civil union, for purposes of tax law, inheritance, etc. The church hasn’t (or, rather shouldn’t have) any interest in those matters. Marriage, on the other hand, is a sacred union, binding the couple in the eyes of the church, God, and each other. The state has no interest in that aspect of the relationship.

Looked at from that perspective, I can’t see why the state would have any concern about the gender of the parties involved. If the church feels that a given union is not right in the eyes of God, then by all means they should not sanctify it with marriage. I disagree with that stance, but I respect that their views are held with honest conviction.

Be that as it may, that’s completely separate from the interest of the state, at least in this country.

Share

Pledges against raising taxes

I went to the website of my representative in Congress, Ted Poe, to voice my opinion on the debt ceiling issue. In the course of reviewing his stand on the issue, I found this quote in the section titled “Taxes/Federal Budget

I came to Congress with a pledge that I will never vote to raise taxes.  I never have and I never will.  Period.

Upon reading that, I was immediately reminded of instances when I have been called on to serve as a juror. One of the instructions that I remember receiving is that, if I cannot imagine an instance where I would be willing to impose the minimum sentence, or if I cannot image an instance where I would be willing to impose the maximum sentence, then I did not have a place on that jury. My civic duty requires that I be willing to consider all legal options.

So, why is it different for a member of Congress? In my opinion, if Congress Member Poe, or any other elected official, is not, under any circumstances, willing to consider all legal options to a given situation, then that Congress member is not doing their job. Note, I do not say that they must ACCEPT that option. Only that they be willing to honestly CONSIDER it.

Mr. Poe — from one humble taxpayer and constituent — please do your job.

Share

We’re moving!

I know it’s been a long time since I updated this thing. Maybe I need to try to make this a discipline to update more regularly.

Anyway, the reason for this post …

We’re moving to New Jersey!

Wendy has accepted a call to be the new Regional Presbyter for the Presbyteries of Monmouth and New Brunswick, in central New Jersey. The formal vote making it all “final and official” will be July 20th. We plan on moving out some time around Labor Day weekend.

This will be very exciting. We’re going to be sad to leave all of our Texas friends, but it will be nice to be back in the north east again, which is, after all, “home” for both of us.

Now we just need to sell our house. Anyone interested?

Share